In his March 25 column, Courier Business Editor Jim Offner acknowledges traditional goals of a "well-grounded college education:" to expose students to great thinkers and to develop skills needed to answer perennial questions about human life. Nevertheless, Offner claims that employers’ demand for "highly specialized workers" makes the liberal arts degree impractical in today’s business environment. Students should pursue degrees in business management rather than in areas such as philosophy or German.

Unconvinced by Offner, we believe that higher education’s purpose is to further the development of persons by enhancing understanding of human intellectual and cultural accomplishments and by developing skills in the areas of critical thinking and writing. There is a profound difference, even an ethical difference, between viewing persons as recipients of education and as the subjects of training. As Martha Nussbaum argues in "Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities," the value of the humanities and arts to a nation is not their profit-making potential; rather, "they make a world that is worth living in, people who are able to see other human beings as people with thoughts and feelings of their own that deserve respect and empathy."

Liberal arts majors in foreign languages and the study of religion well illustrate Nussbaum’s point: These majors build intercultural competence that is formative of individuals and is the necessary foundation of a robust democracy and strong economy. For example, in the absence of knowledge of the world religions and cultures, which furthers understanding and empathy while supporting cross-cultural communication, individuals risk jeopardizing economic and political partnerships that depend on cultural awareness and sensitivity.

As we affirm a long-established vision of higher education, we claim also that liberal arts majors are at a distinct advantage in today’s workplace. The philosophy major aptly illustrates our case. Scores on tests required for admission to the advanced study of law, management, medicine, and other graduate studies show:

Philosophy majors are No. 1 on the LSAT; business majors are No. 24 on the LSAT.

Philosophy majors outperform business majors by a margin of 15 percent on the GMAT.

Philosophy majors, on average, do better than all other majors on the GRE, LSAT, GMAT, and MCAT.

Moreover, a philosophy degree maintains its value over time. The president of Babson College (a business school in Massachusetts), has argued that, due to the pace of change, business skills acquired in the classroom expire in about five years. By contrast, he claims skills learned in liberal arts disciplines such as history and philosophy are long lasting and indispensable to business. Empirical data from PayScale’s annual survey of starting and mid-career salaries of college graduates by major underscore his point. At mid-career, philosophy majors have higher annual salaries than business management majors.

According to a recent article on the humanities published by the University of Colorado, liberal arts graduates are preferred by major companies. Marissa Mayer, a vice president at Google who studied philosophy and psychology at Stanford, reports that, of the 6,000 people Google hires each year, around 4,500 of them are liberal arts or humanities majors. Edward Rust, CEO of State Farm Insurance, shares Ms. Mayer’s preference for liberal arts majors. Rather than ask prospective applicants to demonstrate financial acumen in the hiring process, he hones in on their skills in critical thinking and oral and written communication.

Why do employers prefer to hire students with liberal arts majors? In a national research study of 2,300 college students, summarized in the groundbreaking book Academically Adrift, students majoring in business, education, social work and communications show the smallest gains over four years in critical thinking and analytic reasoning. The big winners in college are liberal arts majors who, over four years, show "significantly higher gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing skills."

Yes, our views on higher education are traditional; however; they also are founded on empirical research. On both counts, we demonstrate that now, as in the past, the liberal arts have an essential role to play in American higher education.

(10) comments

Hwyman

Well said. It's nice to see this kind of commentary. A true education is much more than vocational training and should be recognized as having real value.

xdfred
xdfred

Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?

reojoe
reojoe

[quote]xdfred said: " Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?"[/quote]

Overcoming ignorance about gender issues. ;)

Hwyman

[quote]xdfred said: " Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?"[/quote]

Take a class and see for yourself!

xdfred
xdfred


Hwyman said on: April 2, 2012, 3:18 pm
xdfred said: " Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?"

Take a class and see for yourself!"

XD: Why? I already know it would be a useless major, and with a response like that, you don't know either.

Hwyman

[quote]xdfred said: "Hwyman said on: April 2, 2012, 3:18 pmxdfred said: " Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?"Take a class and see for yourself!" XD: Why? I already know it would be a useless major, and with a response like that, you don't know either."[/quote]

Or it could be I choose not to spend time trying to open your closed mind. You're obviously not one that likes to learn.

xdfred
xdfred


Hwyman said on: April 3, 2012, 9:49 pm
xdfred said: "Hwyman said on: April 2, 2012, 3:18 pmxdfred said: " Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?"Take a class and see for yourself!" XD: Why? I already know it would be a useless major, and with a response like that, you don't know either."

Or it could be I choose not to spend time trying to open your closed mind. You're obviously not one that likes to learn."

XD2: Why do you think I asked? I want to see what anyone else might say. A response of find out for yourself pretty much says you don't know either, despite all the empty rhetoric you throw out. What good is a major like the one I mentioned? Taking a class, as you say, won't answer that question. If you don't know, I suggest you either just say so, or say nothing, since your foolish response is that, foolish.

reojoe
reojoe

Te modern GOP as perfectly illustrated by the Neanderthals on this board: Intellectualism is BAD, science is wrong, and buying falsehoods is a virtue.

Is it any wonder why they believe that there was yellow cake uranium in Africa?

Hwyman

[quote]xdfred said: "Hwyman said on: April 3, 2012, 9:49 pmxdfred said: "Hwyman said on: April 2, 2012, 3:18 pmxdfred said: " Nothing wrong with a well rounded education, but quite a few majors need to not be majors. What's a major in something akin to gender studies good for?"Take a class and see for yourself!" XD: Why? I already know it would be a useless major, and with a response like that, you don't know either."Or it could be I choose not to spend time trying to open your closed mind. You're obviously not one that likes to learn."XD2: Why do you think I asked? I want to see what anyone else might say. A response of find out for yourself pretty much says you don't know either, despite all the empty rhetoric you throw out. What good is a major like the one I
mentioned? Taking a class, as you say, won't answer that question. If you don't know, I suggest you either just say so, or say nothing, since your foolish response is that, foolish."[/quote]

Thanks for the advice, Fred. You're comments are always so enlightening. How do you do it with never a miss?

UNIGrad99

Just found a few items from the piece interesting. How is quoting stats for graduate/higher education refuting the fact that a liberal arts major is better than a business major? That tells me they are more qualified to go do more schooling, am I right? I was an accounting major, I have no doubts I would do terrible on the MCATs, you know why, because I studied accounting, the field I planned on going into, not biology. I also found the comments from the Google VP. So in a down economy, where people are having trouble finding any work,3/4 of Google's 6,000 hires are liberal arts or humanities majors. I'm guessing Google didn't hire 6,000 VPs, so I wonder what the average salary of those new hires were. Likewise, Google has a need for abstract thinkers, I mean, I know I couldn't come up with the cool new ways to spell their name on their search page, it's just not the way I think. So many questions that would be interesting to probe deeper, like the Babson College's president stating that skills learned in the liberal arts are indispensible in business, but the business ideas they are teaching will be outdated in the near term. If that's the case, why should someone pay you $57,000 a year to get a business education?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.