WATERLOO - The city is looking to buy and demolish a hotel at a prime location for new downtown development.
Owners of the Grand Hotel, 300 W. Mullan Ave., have verbally agreed to sell the 100-room lodging operation and adjacent property to the city for $800,000 plus up to $20,000 in closing costs.
"We would raze it and use it for redevelopment," said Community Planning and Development Director Noel Anderson. "That's a pretty major location. It's right there on Highway 63, which we're working on, and it's right next to the TechWorks campus, which we're working on."
City Council members were initially expected to vote on the real estate contract Monday. But action was tentatively rescheduled for the first council meeting in July, which is in the next fiscal year.
"We don't want to start the process and then not be able to finish it in the same fiscal year," Mayor Buck Clark said. "That creates some bookkeeping problems for our (finance department)."
The hotel is adjacent to an "entertainment/sports zone" designated in the city's downtown master plan, within a few blocks of Young Arena, the Waterloo Center for the Arts and the new downtown RiverLoop Expo area and a Cedar River front amphitheater now under construction. Long-term plans call for a recreation center in the entertainment zone.
The Grand Hotel essentially sits in what is the front yard of the Cedar Valley TechWorks, a agricultural technology center and business park being established in and around two former John Deere Westfield Avenue manufacturing buildings.
"That is a primary spot downtown, and we want to own it," Clark said.
Anderson said any purchase agreement would require the hotel to be empty before the city took ownership.
There would also be a period between the council vote and the actual closing "to give us some time to do some environmental investigation and also provide time for people to move."
The hotel, which is owned by 190 Orange Avenue Inc., a corporation in Lakeside, Calif., includes a number of lower income guests who are living there full time or on extended-stay packages. Finding new living arrangements may not be an easy task, said Clark, noting rumors about the sale last year touched off some panic among tenants.
Black Hawk County Assessor's Office records show the hotel and an empty adjoining lot have a combined value of $740,000, with the actual structures accounting for less than half the value. Anderson noted an appraisal determined the $800,000 purchase price, which "is more the value of the land without the buildings."
While the city has been in contact with hotel officials for some time about a buyout, talks picked up after the June 2008 flood which inundated the area around the hotel.
"They did have some flood damage that wasn't helpful to their business," Anderson said. "They weren't fully repaired."
The hotel was built in 1963 and has changed hands and names several times. It became the Twin Torch motel in 1976, turned into the Rodeway Inn in 1988, briefly becoming a Howard Johnson motel in 1995 before rebranding as a Travel Host Inn. The current owners bought it in 2007.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(15) comments
This is wonderful news! It's a win-win situation for everyone; the business owner, the City, and Waterloo citizens. The Grand Hotel and its ancestry has been a problem spot for a long time. I'm glad that urban renewal is going to take place at that very visible location, and that the current business owner is going to receive fair compensation for his property. YEA!
I was the first person to dive in their pool when it was the Clayton House. I stayed there a couple years ago, what a dive! The city has a good idea to get rid of this place!
I have to agree with Voting Publc...tear her down...
Wonderful - where is the City going to magically come up with $800,000 and $20,000 in closing costs? Aren't they scrambling now to get funding to tear down our old schools we seem to inherit, like the Francis Grout School? I agree it is an eye sore and needs to be either renovated or torn down, but why is it the City's responsibility? If it is such prime development land, let the private sector take it over and redevelop it. I know, maybe we can put an $800,000 plus parking lot there. Would someone on the Council please say enough is enough and not waste our tax dollars. I can see it now, the City will spend this $800,000 plus, have demolition costs in the $300,000 to $400,000 range and then give the land away. Makes perfect sense. Who's the developer that suggested the City make this horrible purchase.
Publius -- you are spot on. Who is the developer or group of people who direct the actions of the mayor, council and city administration?
Publius, at least if the City of Waterloo buys the property, there is control over who purchases the property and what is developed or built there. (So we don't have another cement company in the middle of downtown) It is a prime piece of real estate with great visibility, the City will get their money back and more, so I really wouldn't worry about it. Waterloo is on a roll growth wise and attractiveness wise.
Maybe the City can sell tickets to the implosion of this dump to help offset the costs associated with this wonderful transaction. I would pay 42 cents to watch this mess get blown up.
I think a flop house perfectly suits the sports/entertainment zoning in the neighborhood. The city could raise the rates and make some money back by merely acquiring the property. It's still a viable structure, why tear it down!
I agree with Publius 100%
So what we are saying is that our "Sturgeon Bay" police chief cannot clean this up so we are going to buy and remove our problems. OK.
But since we are buying this hotel, wouldn't it make more sense to get rid of the vermon and use it for the "Tech Works" area that is about to EXPLODE with tourism?
Gonna need those 100 hotel rooms for the tour bus traffic we are looking at that doesn't happen to go to elementary school in Waterloo.
Skilled Laborer, It is much easier to remove the "problem area" that attracts the least desirable to downtown. What would you suggest, having a police officer stationed at the hotel 24-7? Im sure that option would be well worth tax dollars. If you were trying to get rid of mice in your kitchen, would you keep leaving crumbs on the floor, or would you make the kitchen spotless of all food that attracted the vermin to begin with?
It is a good buy for the city in the long run, yes short term the idea may appear flawed. In long term speaking the city will have control over who builds on the property and what they build. Downtown does not need another strip club, or half a**ed building project that will attract the same problems that this hotel did. It would make an excellent mixed use, or office building site. Perhaps even a new hotel (one that the city could be proud to have visitors stay in). The possibilities can be endless for this site, and developing it responsibly is key.
When I was a kid growing up downtown Waterloo was a pretty rough area, within the past few years downtown has done an excellent job revitalizing itself and making the downtown area something to be proud of again. Removing this dank hotel is just another step in taking back downtown.
I agree the Grand Hotel was a dump. But when the city is so far in the hole already, I think it is absurd what they paid for this place. Also JC, your rational is humorous... the city bought it so there wouldn't be a cement company there?? I assume you are talking about the great new facility that Manatt built? It shines on the riverfront while Tech Works is an eyesore. Keep in mind that 'cement company' was there long before (70 years) many other things downtown.
the city will buy it for 800000 and sell it for 1.00.
finally, get rid of the out of towners drug palace...too bad the law couldn't handle it.
I remember when Deere used to host customers and top brass at this hotel, then the down turn and IBP busing in transients and the place started and continued to deteriorate. A lot like the inner city of Waterloo, I hope the city can afford to buy out the inner city too.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.