Attorneys request Rubashkin's charges be dropped

2010-05-25T18:00:00Z 2013-05-08T16:13:22Z Attorneys request Rubashkin's charges be droppedBy JEFF REINITZ, jeff.reinitz@wcfcourier.com Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier

WATERLOO - Attorneys for a former Agriprocessors executive have asked the court to throw out child labor charges.

After the prosecution rested Tuesday morning, defense attorneys argued the state didn't present any evidence linking Sholom Rubashkin to the employment of 31 minors at the Postville slaughterhouse.

Rubashkin is on trial for 83 counts of various child labor violations. He also is awaiting sentencing on a federal fraud conviction in connection with loans the plant received.

Judge Nathan Callahan didn't rule on the defense's motion for a directed verdict Tuesday

but indicated there was a good argument to dismiss charges pertaining to five alleged underage workers who didn't testify.

Those workers account for 16 of the 83 counts, and prosecutors seemed to concede five counts that relate to one of the nontestifying witnesses.

"This case is underwhelming and ill-conceived," defense attorney Mark Weinhardt said. He said there was no testimony on the "fighting issue," which was Rubashkin's role, if any, in employing underage workers.

Weinhardt said the state didn't have any evidence that Rubashkin took any actions to employ or continue the employment of any of the minors.

Assistant Attorney General Elisabeth Reynolds argued that the charges should stand. She said language in the law deals with willfully concealing or permitting the employment of minors.

While not ruling, Callahan noted that evidence was presented that there were underage workers, that one supervisor claimed he told Rubashkin about the underage workers, that witnesses said it was obvious there were minors working by standing on the floor and that Rubashkin had been on the floor.

In making his decision, Callahan isn't considering the weight or credibility of the evidence.

Jurors were told to return to court Wednesday morning.

EARLIER STORY:

WATERLOO --- The state rested its case against former Agriprocessors executive Sholom Rubashkin shortly before noon this morning.

The jury was sent home until Wednesday morning when the defense will begin with its witnesses. The prosecutors and defense will return this afternoon when the defense likely will ask the jury for a directed verdict of acquittal.

The last prosecution witness, Elmer Lopez Marroquinn, told jurors he told labor investigators he was under age 18 before the May 2008 immigration raid.

Lopez Marroquinn, a Guatemalan resident who started working for Agriprocessors at the age of 16, said a plant human resources employee told him not to reveal his true age before he met with the inspectors.

But Lopez Marroquinn said he told labor inspectors his real name and age during the private interview. He also told investigators there were other minors at the Postville meatpacking plant.

After answering questions, he went back to work and continued his employment at the plant until the immigration agents raided the facility a month later.

Another witness, Luis Nava Gonzales, who was 17 when he started working at Agriprocessors in March 2008, recounted the same meeting with labor inspectors.

But Nava, who spoke without the assistance of an interpreter, said he told inspectors he was old enough to work at the plant.

Under cross-examination, the defense showed him a statement he signed at the conclusion of the labor interview.

The April 2008 document showed that Nava said he was 19 with a date of birth of 1987. That would have made him 21, and Nava picked up on the inaccuracy while he examined it from the stand.

"I probably was confused about how old I was supposed to be," he said. "They probably thought I was kind of dumb."

Some of the more confrontational parts of the trial so far came during a heated exchange when defense attorney Montgomery Brown asked Nava about his duties wielding a chain saw on the beef kill floor.

When Brown pressed Nava, asking him if work on the floor stopped when the rabbis went home, Nava appeared to read something more into the question.

Nava said the rabbis were lazy but were good people and ranted briefly, at one point asking Brown "What do you think you are?"

Brown let him continue and asked if there was anything else he wanted to say about his client.

Judge Nathan Callahan put an end to the argument, and Nava calmed down and even gave a friendly fist bump to one of Rubashkin's relatives as he left the courtroom.

 

Copyright 2015 Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. LeeMan45
    Report Abuse
    LeeMan45 - May 26, 2010 10:01 am
    what kind of horsecrap is this! there is no evidence that SMR himself knew of underage workers! besides, the "witnesses" are getting paid off with U-Visas
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Courier

Most Popular

Featured Businesses

Deals, Offers & Events

Circulation Specials